Jurnal Komunikasi

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT OF WIRETAPPING IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT PROCESS

2025-06-11T14:58:57+07:00

Judicial oversight of wiretapping in the law enforcement process is an important aspect to maintain the integrity and credibility of the judiciary. This research aims to analyse the effectiveness of the Judicial Commission (KY) in carrying out its supervisory function through wiretapping actions against judges suspected of violating the code of ethics and conduct. The research method used is normative juridical with a qualitative approach, examining legislation, legal doctrine, and the results of previous research. The results showed that the effectiveness of judicial oversight of wiretapping is still not optimal, mainly due to KY's dependence on other law enforcement officials, the resistance of the Supreme Court, and limited regulations and resources. In addition, overlapping authorities and lack of synergy between institutions also hinder the effective implementation of wiretapping. This research recommends the need to strengthen KY's authority, revise regulations, and increase inter-agency collaboration to strengthen judicial oversight and maintain judicial integrity.

A HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED COMMUNICATION WIRETAPPING POLICY MODEL FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT IN INDONESIA

2025-06-11T10:07:01+07:00

This research discusses the model of human rights-based communication tapping policy in law enforcement in Indonesia. The fragmentation of wiretapping regulations in various laws such as the Telecommunications Law, ITE Law, and KPK Law has created legal uncertainty and opened opportunities for violations of citizens' privacy rights. This study uses a literature review method to analyse norm conflicts in wiretapping regulations and formulate a policy model that meets accountability and privacy protection standards. The results show that wiretapping should be conducted based on court permission, with independent supervision, restrictions on scope and duration, and an effective complaint mechanism for victims of illegal wiretapping. Regulatory harmonisation is needed through the establishment of a special law on wiretapping that integrates international human rights principles and accountability, so that wiretapping can be an effective law enforcement instrument without compromising the fundamental rights of citizens.

PENERAPAN KOMUNIKASI DEMOKRATIS DAN KONSTRUKTIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN

2025-06-11T09:28:01+07:00

Land dispute resolution in Indonesia often faces complex challenges due to conflicting interests, lack of transparency, and weak communication between parties. The implementation of democratic and constructive communication is a strategic solution to overcome these problems. Through this approach, all parties involved are given equal space to express their opinions, supported by data transparency and facilitation by neutral parties such as the National Land Agency (BPN). Open deliberation, mediation, and socialisation processes can create a healthy dialogue, strengthen trust, and produce fair and mutually acceptable decisions. Thus, democratic and constructive communication has proven effective in achieving sustainable and equitable resolution of land disputes.

WIRETAPPING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: SURVEILLANCE CHALLENGES TO PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION IN INDONESIA

2025-06-11T15:22:35+07:00

The development of digital technology has brought convenience in information exchange, but also increased the risk of wiretapping and violation of personal data in Indonesia. This research aims to examine the challenges of monitoring wiretapping practices in the context of personal data protection in Indonesia through a literature study of relevant regulations, cases, and literature. The results of the study show that regulatory fragmentation, the absence of independent oversight institutions, weak oversight mechanisms, and low public digital literacy are the main obstacles in protecting personal data from the threat of wiretapping. In addition, the rapid development of technology and cross-border jurisdictional issues complicate monitoring efforts. Regulatory harmonisation, the establishment of effective supervisory institutions, and multi-sector collaboration are needed to strengthen personal data protection in the digital era. This research recommends surveillance system reform, public education, and technical capacity building as strategic steps to create a safe and trusted digital ecosystem in Indonesia.

SURVEILLANCE AND IMPLICATIONS OF WIRETAPPING IN INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ARRANGEMENTS AND PRACTICES

2025-06-11T10:23:46+07:00

This research addresses the surveillance and implications of wiretapping in the perspective of international and national law through a comparative study of regulation and practice, with a focus on the cases of Indonesia and Australia. Wiretapping is an important instrument in law enforcement and state security, but at the same time has the potential to violate human rights, particularly the right to privacy. At the international level, wiretapping is regulated through various human rights instruments such as the UDHR, ICCPR, and the Vienna Convention, which emphasise the protection of privacy and the principle of non-intervention, while leaving room for exceptions for serious crimes. At the national level, Indonesia faces challenges of regulatory fragmentation, weak oversight, and the absence of a specific law that comprehensively regulates wiretapping. The case study of Australia's wiretapping of Indonesia shows that the practice of wiretapping without adequate oversight can damage diplomatic relations and reduce trust between countries. This research recommends harmonising national regulations with international standards, establishing a comprehensive wiretapping law, and strengthening independent oversight institutions to ensure lawful, proportionate and accountable wiretapping practices, while protecting human rights and maintaining stable international relations.

SUPERVISION OF WIRETAPPING AUTHORITY BY THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION (KPK) FROM A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE

2025-06-11T09:44:50+07:00

This study aims to analyse the monitoring mechanism of the Corruption Eradication Commission's (KPK) wiretapping authority from a human rights perspective. The research method used is normative juridical with a literature study approach, which examines various laws and regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature. The results showed that the tapping supervision mechanism by the KPK Supervisory Board still has various weaknesses, such as potential conflicts of interest, risk of information leakage, and unclear standard procedures. In addition, administrative supervision has not been able to fully guarantee the protection of privacy and human rights. Therefore, it is necessary to optimise a more proportional supervision model, through regulatory reform, strengthening independent external supervision, and utilising technology to increase transparency and accountability. This effort is expected to create a balance between the effectiveness of corruption eradication and the protection of human rights in Indonesia.

PERUBAHAN NORMA ETIKA DALAM HUBUNGAN SOSIAL DI PLATFORM MEDIA SOSIAL

2025-06-11T08:59:28+07:00

Changes in ethical norms in social relationships on social media platforms are an inevitable phenomenon in the digital age. Social media has changed the patterns of communication and interaction within society, providing ease in sharing information but also presenting new challenges related to ethics, such as the spread of hoaxes, cyberbullying, privacy violations, and shifts in values of politeness. This transformation has led to a decline in empathy, an increase in self-validation culture, and the emergence of new moral dilemmas that have never been faced before. Therefore, digital literacy, ethical awareness, and collaboration among various parties are needed to ensure that social relationships on social media remain healthy, harmonious, and civilised.

THE ROLE OF COMMUNICATION IN THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF PATIENTS IN HEALTH SERVICES IN INDONESIA: A LITERATURE REVIEW

2025-06-11T15:36:33+07:00

Communication plays a central role in the legal protection of patients in health services in Indonesia. Through effective communication, patients' rights such as the right to medical information, informed consent, and confidentiality of health data can be fulfilled optimally. Clear and transparent communication not only strengthens the patient's legal position, but also minimises potential disputes between patients and health workers. However, the implementation of ideal communication still faces various obstacles, such as time constraints, low health literacy, and the challenge of adapting digital technology in health services. This literature review confirms the importance of strengthening the communication capacity of health workers, educating patients, and updating regulations so that patient legal protection through communication can be realised effectively and evenly throughout Indonesia.