PENERAPAN KOMUNIKASI DEMOKRATIS DAN KONSTRUKTIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN
Keywords:
democratic communication, constructive communication, land disputes, mediation, National Land Agency, transparency, deliberationAbstract
Land dispute resolution in Indonesia often faces complex challenges due to conflicting interests, lack of transparency, and weak communication between parties. The implementation of democratic and constructive communication is a strategic solution to overcome these problems. Through this approach, all parties involved are given equal space to express their opinions, supported by data transparency and facilitation by neutral parties such as the National Land Agency (BPN). Open deliberation, mediation, and socialisation processes can create a healthy dialogue, strengthen trust, and produce fair and mutually acceptable decisions. Thus, democratic and constructive communication has proven effective in achieving sustainable and equitable resolution of land disputes.
References
A. Prasetyo. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tentang Batas Tanah Pada Sertifikat Tanah di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Discretie, 5(1), 183–195.
B. D. Setiawan. (2021). How Can We Mitigate Power Imbalances in Collaborative Environmental Governance? Examining the Role of the Village Facilitation Team Approach Observed in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Sustainability, 13(7), 3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073972
B. Santoso. (2021). Resolusi Konflik Pertanahan: Pendekatan Komunikasi dan Mediasi. Prenadamedia Group.
E. S. Dewi. (2024). The Role of Communication as Agrarian Conflicts Resolution (Systematic Literature Review). Studies in Media and Communication, 12(2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v12i2.6729
F. Ramadhani. (2023). Komunikasi Partisipatif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan: Studi di Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(2), 99–113.
H. S. Siregar. (2021). Problems of Disputes/Conflicts over Land Acquisition towards Development for Public Interest in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 320–325. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.39
H. Yuliani. (2022). Komunikasi Konstruktif dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan: Studi di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Resolusi Konflik, 11(1), 55–70.
I. P. W. Sudarma. (2021). Komunikasi Demokratis dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan di Bali. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Hukum, 7(2), 112–127.
J. Martinez-Alier. (2010). Valuation languages in environmental conflicts: How stakeholders oppose or support gold mining at Mount Ida, Turkey. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.009
J. Mbatha. (2023). Mediation and Land Conflict Resolution: Community Participation and Communication. Journal of African Law, 67(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855322000285
J. Singh. (2021). Democratic Communication and Stakeholder Engagement in Land Dispute Resolution. Land Use Policy, 101, 105210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105210
K. Grönlund. (2011). The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 660–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210395000
L. Y. Mandowen. (2024). Komunikasi Konstruktif dalam Mediasi Sengketa Tanah Adat di Papua. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 22(1), 37–54.
M. Chitkara. (2024). Evaluating Alternative Dispute Resolution in Resolving Land Conflicts in Ifakara, Tanzania. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 1–25.
M. Luskin. (2015). Small Differences that Matter: The Impact of Discussion Modalities on Deliberative Outcomes. British Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123414000167
M. N. Arifin. (2024). Komunikasi Demokratis dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan: Studi Kasus di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Resolusi Konflik Dan Komunikasi, 12(1), 101–119.
M. Purnomo. (2022). Exploring prospects of deliberation in intractable natural resource conflicts: Insights from Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, 115354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115354
M. Syamsuddin. (2022). Komunikasi Efektif dalam Mediasi Sengketa Pertanahan: Studi Kasus di NTB. Jurnal Hukum Dan Resolusi Konflik, 10(1), 67–82.
Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Corwin Press.
N. Fitriani. (2022). Komunikasi Konstruktif dalam Mediasi Sengketa Pertanahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 8(1), 45–60.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., & Bossuyt, P. M. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
R. Setiawan. (2023). Komunikasi Efektif dalam Mediasi Sengketa Pertanahan di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Hukum Dan Komunikasi, 8(1), 89–104.
R. Yuliana. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Jambi [Universitas Jambi]. https://repository.unja.ac.id/58367/6/Skripsi%20Full%20Teks.pdf
S. Dewi. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi: Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 9(1), 55–70.
S. Moyo. (2023). Mediation and Democratic Communication in Land Dispute Resolution in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Studies Review, 66(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2023.18
S. Rahman. (2022). Mediation and Constructive Communication in Land Disputes: Evidence from Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 9(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2022.23
S. Wibowo. (2021). Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan di Indonesia: Studi Literatur. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 51(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no2.2891
T. Wulandari. (2021). Komunikasi Demokratis dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan: Studi di Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Resolusi Konflik, 6(2), 77–89.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Komunikasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
