POLA KOMUNIKASI ANTAR BUDAYA ETNIS MINANG DAN JAWA DI NAGARI SURIAN KABUPATEN SOLOK

Authors

  • Rivatul Indah Yani Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
  • Januar Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia

Keywords:

Communication Patterns, Culture, Minang and Javanese Ethnicity

Abstract

Indonesian culture is delegated a heterogeneous society since it comprises of different sorts of variety in completing correspondence to satisfy their life needs, cooperating both among ethnic gatherings and with others or gatherings with various social foundations, so that is where intercultural correspondence is made. In Surian, there are different networks with various social foundations living there, for example, the Minang and Javanese identities, correspondence between individuals' societies generally happens and they live next to each other. This examination was led to decide correspondence designs among Minang and Javanese ethnic societies in Nagari Surian and what elements support and repress intercultural correspondence. To figure out correspondence examples and supporting and restraining factors for correspondence in Nagari Surian, field research was utilized. Information assortment was done by perception, meetings and documentation to make it simpler to figure out correspondence examples and supporting and restraining factors for correspondence in Nagari Surian. The creator utilized the Snowball Inspecting Strategy. In view of the examination results, the example of correspondence among Minang and Javanese ethnic societies in the Surian town of Solok Regime is very great with the essential correspondence design, specifically the Minang and Javanese ethnic networks involving verbal and non-verbal correspondence in regular day to day existence. The straight correspondence design, in particular the Minang ethnic local area and Javanese convey straightforwardly or up close and personal by tuning in and seeing what is said first and afterward making determinations by checking out at their way of behaving and developments. Round correspondence designs, specifically the presence of criticism or equal connections between the Minang and Javanese ethnic networks so this seldom occurs. misreading in correspondence.

References

Andi. (2023). Wawancara Bapak Jorong Tambang.

Audrey Kahim. (2005). Dari Pemberontakan Ke Integrasi : Sumatera Barat Dan Politik Indonesia. Buku Obor.

Burhan Bungin. (2015). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Rajawali Pers.

Chairul Anwar. (1997). Chairul Anwar, Hukum Adat Indonesia Meninjau Adat Minangkabau. PT Rineka Cipta.

Deddy Mulyana. (2005). Komunikasi Antar Budaya. PT. Renaja rosdakarya.

M.Hasbi. (1990). Nagari Desa Dan Pembangunan Di Sumatera Barat. Yayasan Genta budaya.

Malin. (2023). Wawancara, Toko Masyarakat Etnis Minang.

Moch.Yusuf Wijaya and Khoirul Anwar. (2020). Pola Komunikasi Antar Budaya Santri Pondok Pesantren Sunan Kalijogo Jabung Malang. Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 1(2), 115.

Mochamad Rizak. (2018). Peran Pola Komunikasi Antarbudaya Dalam Mencegah Konflik Antar Kelompok Agama. Islamic Communication, 3(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2018.3.1.2680

Morissan. (2013). Morissan, Teori Komunikator Pesan Percakapan Dan Hubungan Interpersonal. Ghalia Indonesia.

Nila. (2023). Wawancara Masyarakat etnis Minang.

Nurliza. (2023). Wawancara Masyarakat etnis Jawa.

Pemerintahan Nagari. (2013). Monografi NagarI Surian.

Rifa’i Abubakar. (2021). Rifa’i Abubakar, Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Rifa’i Abubakar, Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian (Yogyakarta: Suka-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Rizky Wulandari and Muhammad Luthfi. (2022). Pola Komunikasi Antarbudaya Dalam Menjalin Keharmonisan Hidup Bermasyarakat Suku Jawa Di Lingkungan Ix Kelurahan Mabar Hilir. 5(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.46576/jnm.v5i1.1828

Sjahmunir. (2006). Pemerintah Nagari Dan Tanah Ulayat. Andalas UniversityPress.

Sukiati. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Sebuah Pengantar. CV. Manhaji.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-19

Issue

Section

Articles